
The Department of Homeland Security’s abrupt decision to end protections for Afghan nationals has sparked legal battles and raised fears of mass deportation and broken promises.
At a Glance
- DHS rescinded Temporary Protected Status for Afghan nationals on May 12
- TPS was granted after the 2021 Taliban takeover of Afghanistan
- Protections will end on July 12, citing “improved conditions”
- Advocacy group CASA Inc. filed a lawsuit challenging the decision
- Critics say the move contradicts U.S. humanitarian commitments
Abrupt Reversal Leaves Afghans in Limbo
On May 12, the Department of Homeland Security announced it would terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Afghan nationals by July 12, ending a policy implemented after the chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Kabul in 2021. DHS claims Afghanistan has “stabilized” sufficiently to justify the revocation—a justification that has shocked advocacy groups and alarmed thousands of Afghans who believed they had a temporary but reliable refuge.
Watch a report: DHS Ends Afghan TPS Protections.
Immigrant advocacy organization CASA Inc. immediately filed suit against DHS, claiming the agency violated legal procedures and undermined due process. With around 76,000 Afghans evacuated to the U.S. since the fall of Kabul, many now face an uncertain future—even as the Taliban remains in control and conditions on the ground remain volatile.
DHS Cites National Interest and Safety
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem defended the agency’s position, stating that Afghanistan’s “security and economy have improved,” and noting concerns over “fraud” and “public safety.” Officials further claim the move aligns with national interest priorities, but critics say this paints an overly optimistic picture of a war-ravaged state still under authoritarian rule.
The Federal Register notice added that the decision aimed to prevent exploitation of immigration protections, yet similar efforts to rescind TPS for Venezuelans have been blocked in court—hinting that DHS may face serious legal obstacles. CASA’s lawsuit argues that DHS failed to follow standard review and notification protocols, and is demanding immediate injunctive relief.
Political Fallout and Humanitarian Questions
For many, the policy reversal symbolizes a deeper conflict in U.S. immigration politics—between enforcement and humanitarian obligations. Critics argue that ending protections for Afghans contradicts prior commitments to allies and refugees who risked their lives during America’s longest war.
The backlash has extended to Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are demanding oversight hearings into DHS’s decision-making process. Advocates warn of a chilling effect on America’s global credibility. “We promised these people sanctuary,” said one CASA representative. “Breaking that promise has consequences—not just for them, but for how the world sees our word.”
Afghan families in the U.S. are bracing for upheaval as deportation proceedings may start in two months. They are closely watching the legal battle, as the outcome will impact America’s immigration saga.