January 6 defendants are launching a $50 billion lawsuit against the federal government, claiming politically motivated persecution and unjust treatment in the aftermath of the Capitol riot.
They’re getting their own back!
At a Glance
- Over 100 January 6 defendants are filing a $50 billion class-action lawsuit against the DOJ
- The lawsuit, led by Jake Lang, alleges politically motivated persecution and seeks restitution
- Plaintiffs claim they were exercising First Amendment rights and faced a “weaponized justice system”
- The legal action is set to be filed on January 20, 2025, accusing the DOJ of selective enforcement against conservatives
Lawsuit Details and Allegations
More than 100 individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol protests are preparing to file a $50 billion class-action lawsuit against the Department of Justice. The legal action, spearheaded by January 6 defendant Jake Lang, aims to address what the plaintiffs describe as politically motivated persecution and unjust treatment in the wake of the Capitol breach.
“This isn’t just about restitution—it’s about setting a precedent,” Jake Lang said.
The lawsuit, officially named the January 6 Restitution and Wrongful Incarceration Lawsuit, is scheduled to be filed on January 20, 2025. It accuses the DOJ of selective enforcement against conservatives and alleges that the plaintiffs were exercising their First Amendment rights when they faced what they term a “weaponized justice system.”
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit cite numerous hardships resulting from their involvement in the January 6 events. These include loss of family businesses, homes, and careers, as well as significant emotional and psychological damage. Many claim they were wrongfully incarcerated and separated from their families for extended periods.
“The damage to children who have spent four years without their fathers at home cannot be put into monetary value,” Lang stated.
The legal team, which includes conservative attorneys, aims to expose what they perceive as injustices and seek compensation for harm allegedly caused by the justice system. They argue that the DOJ’s response to the Capitol breach was disproportionate and politically motivated, citing leniency in other protest cases as a point of comparison.
It’s about time they got justice.
We’ll report back with updates on the case.
