California Dems FORCED To Stop $50 Million Anti-Trump Plan Over Wildfires

California Democrats delay $50 million anti-Trump fund as wildfires ravage the state, raising questions about priorities and resource allocation.

They know they need Trump’s help, and so they’ve been forced to change course.

At a Glance

  • California Democrats postpone vote on $50 million package to fight Trump policies
  • Delay follows devastating wildfires and President Trump’s visit to Los Angeles
  • Package includes $25 million for lawsuits against federal government and $25 million for immigrant defense
  • Critics argue state should prioritize disaster response over political agendas
  • Concerns raised about California’s request for federal disaster funds while opposing Trump

Democrats Halt Anti-Trump Fund Amid Wildfire Crisis

As wildfires continue to ravage California, state Democrats have made the unexpected decision to postpone a vote on a $50 million spending package aimed at challenging President Trump’s policies. The delay comes in the wake of Trump’s recent visit to fire-stricken Los Angeles and highlights the growing tension between state and federal authorities over disaster management and aid.

Once Trump pulls through and helps them, though…they could well still go ahead with the vote.

The proposed fund, which had already gained approval from the California State Senate, was designed to allocate $25 million for lawsuits against the federal government and another $25 million to assist nonprofits in blocking deportations and providing legal services. However, as the flames of the Palisades Fire approached the District of Assembly Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel, the urgency of the situation became impossible to ignore.

The decision to delay the vote has sparked intense debate over the state’s priorities during a time of crisis. Critics argue that focusing on political battles while wildfires cause unprecedented destruction is misguided at best and potentially harmful at worst.

The postponement of the anti-Trump fund vote also brings to light the complex relationship between California and the federal government. As the state seeks additional federal funds for disaster relief, questions are being raised about the appropriateness of simultaneously allocating resources to oppose Trump’s policies.

“This funding agreement cements California’s readiness to serve as a bulwark against Trump’s extremist agenda,” State Senate Budget Committee Chair Scott Wiener (D.), who is considering a campaign to succeed Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D.) in Congress, told Politico.

Such statements have led to suggestions that a Special Master be appointed to ensure federal funds are used solely for rebuilding efforts. This proposal reflects growing concerns about the potential misuse of disaster relief funds for political purposes.

If California Dems had any sense, they’d stop working against the President and work with him instead.