Attempted Trump Assassin Ryan Routh to Go on Trial in Feb. 2025

A man accused of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump faces a legal battle that could stretch into 2025, as his defense team grapples with an overwhelming mountain of evidence.

At a Glance

  • Ryan Routh is accused of attempting to assassinate then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a Florida golf course
  • Routh’s trial is set for February 2025, but his defense seeks a delay until December 2025
  • The defense argues that the current trial schedule violates Routh’s due process rights due to the volume of evidence
  • Prosecutors are open to a modest delay but oppose pushing the trial to December 2025
  • Routh faces potential life imprisonment if convicted

The Charges and the Defendant

Ryan Routh stands accused of a brazen attempt to assassinate Donald Trump, a crime that strikes at the heart of our democratic process. The incident, which occurred at Trump International Golf Club in Florida, has thrust Routh into a high-stakes legal battle with far-reaching implications. Routh faces serious charges, including attempting to assassinate a political candidate and possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number as a convicted felon. Despite the gravity of these accusations, Routh has maintained his innocence, pleading not guilty to all charges.

The circumstances surrounding Routh’s arrest are chilling. A Secret Service agent reportedly spotted Routh aiming a loaded rifle at the golf club where Trump was present. This wasn’t a spur-of-the-moment act, according to prosecutors. They allege that Routh had camped outside the golf course for 12 hours, suggesting a level of premeditation that adds weight to the charges against him.

A Mountain of Evidence

The sheer volume of evidence in the case is staggering. It includes data from 18 phones, three computers, three tablets, five storage disks, expert analyses, phone records, and an astounding 3,000 photographs. The defense team is facing the daunting task of sifting through several terabytes of data and preparing to cross-examine nine expert witnesses. This isn’t just a matter of reviewing documents; it’s a massive undertaking that requires careful analysis and expert interpretation.

The evidence doesn’t stop at digital data. Prosecutors have disclosed Routh’s lengthy criminal record and, most damning of all, a note allegedly written by Routh himself about attempting to assassinate Trump. This piece of evidence, if authenticated, could be a smoking gun in the prosecution’s case.

The Battle for Due Process

Routh’s defense team is fighting an uphill battle against time. They argue that the current trial schedule, set for February 2025, violates Routh’s due process rights. Their contention is that they simply cannot adequately prepare a defense in the face of such overwhelming evidence without more time. The defense is pushing for a delay until December 2025, a request that has met resistance from prosecutors.

The Justice Department, while open to a modest delay, argues that pushing the trial to December 2025 is unreasonable. They cite the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, which guards against unreasonable delays in the judicial process. There’s also concern about the potential influence on the jury pool if the trial is delayed too long.